My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father's hand. I and the Father are one." Again the Jews picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus said to them, "I have shown you many great miracles from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?" We are not stoning you for any of these," replied the Jews, "but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God." Jesus answered them, "Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'(Psalm 82)? If he called them 'gods,' to whom the word of God came - and the Scripture cannot be broken - what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent him into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said "I am God's Son'?NIV

On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you.NIV

"My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one: I in them and you in me NIV

his students got carried away with their love for their teacher, and blew things way out of proportion.

These implications that you find in your NT, to claim that he called himself god, were written by followers who took his words literally (probably because they believed these things on their own). They wrote it down to convey the message that they wanted the people to believe.

Please quote any part of the OT that supports any claim about jesus and I will show you how this is an incorrect reading or even a distortion.

I believe that jesus sincerely meant well, but he failed in his mission.
The real massiah won't fail because he is truly sent by god.

If the truth leads me to believe that jesus was not the massiah then let it be.

I don't see it logical to believe that he came back after death, especially since there is no trace of evidence other that the writings of his followers.

Our faith in the OT is based on a tradition that has been passed down through the ages, that it (the OT) was given by god and his prophets. Therefore we believe in it as we believe in god himself.The NT was recorded not by prophets, but by faithful followers, of a man they were sold on. We have no indication that the NT is the message of god. Faith in the OT is not comparable to faith in the NT.

If you believe that the scriptures which clearly point to Jesus are incorrect or a distortion my quoting them will serve no purpose.

Firstly, let's look at the scripture that states "Fathers will not die because of their son's sins and sons will not die for their fathers sins, rather a man will only die for his own sins" (numbers 24.16).

the oracle of one who hears the words of God, who has knowledge from the Most High, who sees a vision from the Almighty, who falls prostrate, and whose eyes are opened

Let's move on to (numbers 13.2-6) the discussion of false prophets. Here we learn clearly that even though the false prophet succeeds in performing miracles, god tells us that we should not follow him.

Send some men to explore the land of Canaan, which I am giving to the Israelites. From each ancestral tribe send one of its leaders." So at the LORD's command Moses sent them out from the Desert of Paran. All of them were leaders of the Israelites. These are their names: from the tribe of Reuben, Shammua son of Zaccur; from the tribe of Simeon, Shaphat son of Hori; from the tribe of Judah, Caleb son of Jephunneh;

What about (numbers 28.1-14) all the blessings that are promised to those faithful servants that serve god without sin. The promises that no harm will come to the clean soul, and all enemies will run from him.

The belief that Jesus died for our sins is a contradiction to this promise in the OT. In addition, according to this scripture, the assumption must be that Jesus died for his own sins.

The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers; every man shall be put to death for his own sin.

thou shalt not bow down unto them, nor serve them; for I HaShem thy G-d am a jealous G-d, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate Me;

And David said unto Nathan: 'I have sinned against HaShem.' And Nathan said unto David: 'The HaShem also hath put away thy sin; thou shalt not die. Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast greatly blasphemed the enemies of HaShem, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.' And Nathan departed unto his house. And HaShem struck the child that Uriah's wife bore unto David, and it was very sick. David therefore besought G-d for the child; and David fasted, and as often as he went in, he lay all night upon the earth..And it came to pass on the seventh day, that the child died.

Concerning the child of King David who died from the sin of his father; since the child was a product of the seed that caused the sin, the child was considered to be part of the sin and died as a result. Even though the child had no choice in the matter, he was a sinful seed and god would not allow him to live. This is not considered to be punished at all; not for his fathers sin or for his own.

Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast greatly blasphemed the enemies of HaShem, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die.

I think that your thinking on this issue is influenced by your being convinced that Jesus was the exception to all the rules. But he was in fact subject to all the rules that the OT teaches us.

Surely our diseases he did bear, and our pains he carried; whereas we did esteem him stricken, smitten of G-d, and afflicted. But he was wounded because of our transgressions, he was crushed because of our iniquities: the chastisement of our welfare was upon him, and with his stripes we were healed. All we like sheep did go astray, we turned every one to his own way; and HaShem hath made to light on him the iniquity of us all. He was oppressed, though he humbled himself and opened not his mouth; as a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and as a sheep that before her shearers is dumb; yea, he opened not his mouth. By oppression and judgment he was taken away, and with his generation who did reason? for he was cut off out of the land of the living, for the transgression of my people to whom the stroke was due. And they made his grave with the wicked, and with the rich his tomb; although he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.' Yet it pleased HaShem to crush him by disease; to see if his soul would offer itself in restitution, that he might see his seed, prolong his days, and that the purpose of HaShem might prosper by his hand: Of the travail of his soul he shall see to the full, even My servant, who by his knowledge did justify the Righteous One to the many, and their iniquities he did bear. Therefore will I divide him a portion among the great, and he shall divide the spoil with the mighty; because he bared his soul unto death, and was numbered with the transgressors; yet he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.

Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel.

Therefore the L-rd Himself shall give you a sign: behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

If he taught them that he is god, or the son of god, then I would have to conclude that he was actually a fake and a sinner; Because as I explained earlier, this is considered idol worship and forbidden by god. In this case Jesus would not fit with the Yisheyah description.

If he claimed to be a prophet and/or massiah but truly wasn't, then again he is not the holy person some believe.

If he simply attempted to teach the OT properly as he claimed (from what I understand), then I am left with some questions.
Why do so many people claim that he is god, and claim that he himself made this claim? Did such thinking come from him or was this a distortion that resulted from the writings of his so-called followers?

My question is what proof do we have that the man who was tortured to death was actually a good man and an innocent man that did us the great kindness of suffering instead of us.

Does he take part in the building of the third and final temple?

Will he follow the commands of the OT?

Will the Jewish people still be considered the chosen people?

Does he return as a human?

Will he die again?

Will he be the same person that he was the first time around?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through Him all things were made; without Him nothing was made that has been made.

many places in the OT have reference to the massiah, but who they refer to will only be known after he is fully successful in completing his job. This job is only complete after the Temple is restored through his efforts and the whole world accepts god and the kingdom of the massiah who descends from King David.

For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.

In the beginning was the word(plan or intention), and the word(plan or intention) was with God, and the word(plan or intention) was God. It(The plan or intention) was with God in the beginning. Through it(the plan or intention) all things were made; without it(the plan or intention) nothing was made that has been made.

Concerning Isaiah 9:5-Before discussing the names/titles given to this child, it should be understood that this child seems to be Yechizkiyahu, the son of Achaz (who will become the next king of Yehudah), who was born about 400 years before Jesus, as I explained earlier. From the flow of the prophesies in the chapters before and after this one, it becomes obvious that this is the time frame that it's dealing with.

For a child is born unto us, a son is given unto us; and the government is upon his shoulder; and his name is called Pele-joez-el-gibbor-Abi-ad-sar-shalom;

That the government may be increased, and of peace there be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to establish it, and to uphold it through justice and through righteousness from henceforth even for ever. The zeal of HaShem of hosts doth perform this.

I would like to know if there are any sources that trace the lineage of Jesus back to Joseph instead of King David?

I understand that it is not clear from the NT that Jesus can be traced to King David beyond a doubt

I also want to know if the NT mentions That jesus told the gentiles to serve god in different ways than the Jewish people?

Our New Testament records Jesus preaching to Jews, Samaritans and Gentiles

We Know that there is a soul that belongs to the massiah, and in every generation, this soul is placed in the body of one relative to King David, with the potential for that soul to complete it's job. If the people in the generation are not ready for the massiah then he cannot complete his job. He may die, and the soul moves into another body of a relative to King David.